Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ASCEND) analyse RADIUS logs
I had a terricly horrible time trying to discern what was going on in this
message.. so I corrected and added quotes so that it would make sense...
read on..
On Fri, 15 Aug 1997, Kenneth Packert wrote:
> Thanks for looking at NavisAccess! Below are my comments:
I wrote:
>> The other gripe is that it doesn't show the traffic on the ISDN
>> connection of our P75.
> What does traffic mean? We show both IP and interface level stats. The
> problem that I see is that the damn ifIndex that is used changes with
> every connection. Fixing this is beyond this release. We will get it
> next time.
I guess you really didn't read where I mentioned I was talking about
NetClarity. ;)
>> It will show local network traffic though and that doesn'treally work.
> What do you mean?
Well, I thought it was pretty selfexplanatory, but sometimes I don't hink
like other people do -- dunno. To rephrase: It will show the "percent"
[I'm guessing as there is no real documentation on it...] of bandwidth
used by a particular interface. It shows that information for the
ethernet connections - which is all well and fine, but it really should
show more than just a dead pulse for the ISDN connection - especially when
the traffic is about 90% according to the ALU and CLU... and I'm typing on
my shell via the internet routing done with the P75..
> It also did the same thing for the Max4004 and TNT that we
> tested it on. Not to mention the bay networks router we also use. So,
> exactly what good is it when you can't see Internet traffic? ;) Ethernet
> is kewl and all, but not at all the total network.
Ditto what I said before. ;)
--
Joseph Hickman
Director of Network Operations
josephh@psn.net / iconia@psn.net
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: